Album Reviews

1—————>3—————5
Terrible——————>Fantastic

5
Walz, C-Rayz We Live (The Black Samurai EP)

4
Big Country Bluegrass Up In The High Country
Decay Demonic Orgazm
Deerhoof Apple O
Deerhoof Halfbird
Delta 5 Singles & Sessions
DJ Rolando Aztek Mystic Mix, The
Five Deez Kommunicator
Maarifa Street Magic Realism
R.E.M. Life’s Rich Pageant
Sia Colour The Small One

3
Belle & Sebastian Life Pursuit, The
Budd, Harold Avalon Sutra
Cale, John Inside The Dream Synicate, Volume 02
Cardigans, The Super Extra Gravity
Cohen, Leonard Ten New Songs
Various Artists Constructions for Andrey Kiritchenko
Eno, Brian and Harold Budd Pearl, The
Holy Fuck Holy Fuck
Kandi, Hed Nu Cool 01
Plaid Plaid Remixes Parts In The Post
Prefuse 73 Security Screenings
Various Artists Shaolin Soul, Volume 01
Tangerine Dream Dream Sequence
Tangerine Dream Encore
Tangerine Dream Thief
Xanakis, Iannis Chamber Music (1950-1990)

2
Ben, Jorge and Gilberto Gil Gil e Jorge
Bowles, Paul Baptism of Solitude
Carlos, Wendy Digital Moonscapes
Carlos, Wendy Switched On Bach 2000
Carlos, Wendy Well-Tempered Synthesizer, The
Gil, Gilberto and Jorge Ben Ogum Xango
Gorecki, Henryk Symphony #3 (Sorrowful Songs)
Oldfield, Mike Hergest Ridge
Sinistri Free Pulse
Subotnick, Morton Silver Apples of the Moon
Tangerine Dream Cyclone
Tangerine Dream Great Wall Of China
Tangerine Dream Hollywood Years, The, Volume 1
Wagner, Richard Tristan und Isolde

1
Nico Chelsea Girl
Nico Marble Index, The
Toad the Wet Sprocket Fear

Scientastic!

The title is a reference to a museum in Brussels, where I recently visited. I failed in both visiting the museum and taking a photo of the museum’s numerous signs (although maybe ZS can come through for me on the latter).

In any event, during my trip I visited several art museums, some of which had significant collections of religious-related works. Many of these are beautiful and impressive, but I began thinking about how/why science seems to be so uninspiring and yields few works of art, or a creative movement dedicated to it.

While thinking about this, I came to feel foolish for not recognizing everything around us, all of which is a result of (some degree of) the scientific method. This includes planes, trains, and automobiles, as well as the materials, processes, and preservation of the religious artwork I saw during my trip (Note: The NGA also has an excellent collection of religious artwork).

At the same time, I felt that science deserved works that fit within the traditionally conceived framework of art. And, in Brussels, I found it: Atomium.

The Google (and GIM and GMail)

Given the attention Google receives, including from techies, investors, and media-types, it is surprising to see how little attention and analysis there has been regarding Google’s integration of Google Talk (or GIM) with GMail.

In general, Google uses sophisticated models and data-mining techniques to deliver more relevant advertising to users. Increasingly, however, the company is microscoping those techniques down to a user-specific level. The bait to tie advertising to a specific user (e.g., me), rather than a general type of user (e.g., people who perform a search for “glass + composer + ‘tour dates'”), was/is GMail. To use the service, people log in and have a specific account. In its initial form, e-mails were scanned and relevant advertising provided.

But that crude method, which was and to some degree remains the standard method, only provides a one-dimensional (i.e., e-mail) information/revenue stream. Steadily, Google has increased the number of services/revenue streams that improve/adjust when a user is logged into what was his or her GMail account and is now more generally referred to as a Google account. These includes News.Google, Base.Google, Images.Google, Groups.Google, and (Search.)Google.

While the Google (nee GMail) account was, and remains, the bait for attracting users to create trackable/information-creating accounts, GIM’s incorporation into GMail–which is done adequately, although not impressively, well–is the hook that keeps users logged in, trackable, and able to be advertised to in a personal (rather than customizable or typed) manner. That’s because GIM requires you to be logged in constantly and because there are people who only access their e-mail account when checking for new messages (as opposed to running it continuously and being notified when there is e-mail). The combination of the two is a significant barrier to Google’s efforts to collect user-specific data, but a barrier that is overcome because of GIM’s always-logged-in character. Important to remember is that once a user remains logged in the other personalizable Google services are activated, thereby generating not just the GIM and GMail information/revenue streams, but also a number of others (e.g., News.Google). That one GIM/GMail door opens up many worlds of new information gathering and advertising potential.

In fact, GIM’s integration with GMail may be one of the most important new products/developments the company has rolled out, and yet it met with little discussion and fanfare from the tech and investment community.