One of the largest problems we face is a lack of organized lobbying on behalf of the everyday tech industry. The amount of ignorance–and not malicious intent–is stunning and contributing to dangerous trends. Here’s a quick round-up of some of the most recent mind-blowing examples of what I mean:
- The US Air Force issues DMCA take down notices for a promotional video: Um, it’s a promo video guys. And don’t forget the government can’t copyright anything.
- The FBI has unlimited access to cell phone data: There is an assumption underlying the debate about US wiretapping authority that the US government can either have unfettered access (That’s why the telecoms need immunity!) or none (Those who want to limit government wiretapping abilities are terrorists!). Have that many people forgotten we have process in place that allow the government access when established criteria are met and that both companies and the government should be punished when they do not operate within those processes and meet those criteria?)
- TSA Specs for a Safe Bag for Bringing Laptops on Planes: Here are some terror-fying Soviet-like design specs for a bag the TSA would approve so you don’t have to drag your laptop out of its case upon search.
Are you implying that there is no malicious intent? Or, just that it isn’t stunning? Who are you claiming doesn’t have malicious intent?
Good questions, and I should have written that bit more clearly. The point I try to make is that “our” ignorance is causing a dangerous situation with regard to tech and tech policy. Sure, there is maliciousness out there, but that your everyday person (i.e., non-Geek) is not going to understand copyright law, know what DMCA even is, and probably spend much time on the meta issues regarding airline security.
It is incumbent on the geeks, therefore, to ‘lobby’ (or educate) policymakers and others as to the impact of these policies and the evolving tech environment. As it is, the only groups doing so are lobbyists for big companies who have interests that may run counter to the wider population (i.e., telecoms seeking immunity) and the US bureaucracy (that’s a technical use of the term, not a loaded use), which has developed a (poorly developed) security-above-all-else mindset.
Just like how EFF and CC educates, more and bigger education efforts are needed to break down what are incredibly complex issues (policy + law + tech = crazy complex) to the basics so normal people can grasp the situation.