Tag Archives: Harper’s

Phone Book Digitization as Precursor to Internet of Things

John Crowley’s more than just amusing account of helping digitize NYC’s first phone book in the September 2014 issue of Harper’s might be a primer on some of the hiccups we may experience moving to an Internet of Things.

Standards and Universality

The first listing is simply A, at 2145 Amsterdam Avenue. The next listing is another A, on 2nd Avenue, and then A, on East 38th Street. And I am reminded of the trick then used by New Yorkers who didn’t want to pay the charge for an unlisted phone number, or wanted a secret number easily passed to others. You just had your phone listed in code, or by your nickname, or a memorable letter.

The Non-glorious Positions Needed to Make IoT Happen

I remember these and similar peculiarities of the 1968 phone book only because, along with a number of other hippies, street people, oddballs, losers, and dropouts, I was hired that year by a temporary employment agency to proofread the pages of the Manhattan directory in a loft someplace in the West 40s.

The decrease of human readability

When we discovered an error in the new book (I can’t remember now what shorthand word we used for it), we took, from a constantly replenished pile, a slip of paper printed at the top with the letters B M L D T, each letter corresponding to a particular class of error. (We called this slip a “bee-melt.”) The faulty listing was copied onto the sheet and the appropriate letter circled.

and more…

Things I Learned this Week

Among the things I learned this week:
* C&C systems aren’t always patchable. (Courtesy: Bruce Schneier)

* Italy has an incredible history and relationship with dubbing. (Courtesy: Harper’s Magazine)

* Kobe beef doesn’t exist in the US, unless it’s smuggled. (Courtesy: Forbes)

* There should be a job title of software technician. (Courtesy: Aaron Iba)

* Roller derby women are fit! (Courtesy: Surburbia Roller Derby)

Proto-Analysis of USG/Military Reading Lists

Within the past month, The New Yorker and Harper’s have looked at suggested reading lists crafted by the military and US government more generally. Both articles are worth at least skimming, and a proper analysis of the lists is definitely due if it has not been done thus far (Google did not yield any dissertations or books after some quick and basic searches). Interesting stuff.