Tag Archives: culture

Start Ups and New York Review of Books

The founding of New York Review of Books is a nice story and contains good bits to keep in mind when thinking about corporate historical narratives and start ups:

Bob and Barbara worked night and day assigning authors, finding a designer, hoping for the copy to arrive before the strike ended. Forty-five reviewers agreed to and met a three-week deadline, with no pay. That first issue looked nothing like what The Review looks like today. Each page, including the front cover, consisted of three unbroken columns of solid type, except where Barbara placed a few woodcuts. On the front page Fred Dupee reviewed Jimmy Baldwin’s The Fire Next Time, admiring its passion but objecting to its acceptance of violence. It achieved just the quality of gravitas and fluency we hoped for. No reader of that piece could fail to see the point of our project. The strike lasted just long enough for Eastern News to ship the entire first printing. There were no unsold copies. In an editors’ note we solicited readers’ opinions. Two thousand letters arrived urging us to continue. That fall we acquired a publisher, Whitney Ellsworth, to handle financial and production issues, and the first regular issue appeared.

What impresses me are the completely unanticipated events that came together to make The Review possible. The newspaper strike that provided the opportunity to make the kind of review that Lizzie’s article demanded. The chance meeting that afternoon when Barbara and Lizzie decided on dinner. Bob’s availability. The publishers’ unspent advertising budgets and the ability of Eastern News to reach the right readers. The willingness of forty-five authors to complete their unpaid assignments on time. The duration of the strike. That all this came together seems in retrospect to have been a miracle.

Things I Learned this Week

Among the things I’ve learned this week:
* Black ASL (Courtesy: Washington Post)

* Fifteen percent of lung cancer cases are in non-smokers. (Courtesy: New Yorker)

* The country’s oldest endowed chair is the Hollis Chair of Divinity at Harvard Divinity School. The chair was established in 1721. (Courtesy: NYT)

* Push presents. (Courtesty: EC)

* Mel Brooks co-created Get Smart. (Courtesy: Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee)

Revising the Socially-Acceptable Dating Age Formula to be Useful

The Issue
The formula 7+x/2 is a common formula for determining the socially acceptable age of a dating partner. Substantively, this dating age formula states that you should not date someone younger than half your age plus seven. Properly used, the formula provides an age band within which are ages that your partners should be. As pleasant as this rule is, it is mostly theoretical and demands a more applicable version. This post provides that more applicable version.

The Problem
The formula 7+x/2 only is useful when positing which people would be socially acceptable to date. This presents two specific problems. First, identifying entire universes of people who are ideal partners is an unproductive exercise in dreaming. For example, people generally want to date beautiful non-impoverished people who have no baggage and whose parents are delightful people. But as nearly everyone knows, only a fraction of the world dates beautiful people, most people are impoverished, everyone has baggage, and all but two parents are distinctly un-delightful. Furthermore, crafting these rules of I want to date this type of person or that type of person blinds or biases one against potential partners in your immediate social vicinity. These flaws make the formula about as valuable as commenting on the weather.

Even at its most useful, this formula is only helpful–and even then for just that moment–when you find someone you are considering dating and want to know whether that person is an acceptable age. The problem, though, is that the rule can only tell you the answer for that moment in time, not down the road. For example, you may be interested in someone “too” young for you now, but what about next year? The year later? You have to re-calculate every year. Fail.

The graph below illustrates how, at the present moment, it is inappropriate for a 33 year old to date a 22 year old, but that at some point in the future it will be appropriate. To explain a bit more: The red line is the minimum age for which it is appropriate to date someone. The X axis is the older person and the Y axis is the younger person. The blue line plots the ages of two people who are 33 and 22 now (next year, they are 34 and 23, etc.). The correct interpretation of this graph is that for any ages below the red line, it is inappropriate to date. For any ages at or above the red line, it is appropriate (Note: the upper limit is not taken into account in this chart). What should become clear is that even though it is inappropriate for a 33 and 22 year olds to date now, it becomes appropriate at some point in the future. And this switch in appropriateness happens in all cases (Note: again, this does not take into account upper level appropriateness).

How long do I have to wait to date someone

In such situations, the crucial question becomes when is it appropriate to date someone? And that is the situation in most cases, as one can not choose anyone they want to date but, to put it crudely, is handed someone to date (i.e., the universe of possible partners is not infinite).

The Solution
As mentioned before, the important moment is when the slope of appropriateness (i.e., x/2+7) intersects with the line of how a given couple ages. You could either find the intercept point or add a time element to the original formula. Let’s do the latter (courtesy of MK), with t equaling the number of years, x being the older person’s age, and d being the age delta/difference:

ynow + t = (1/2)(xnow+t) + 7

t – (1/2)(t) = (1/2)(xnow) – ynow + 7

(1/2)(t) = (1/2)(xnow) – Ynow + 7

t = xnow – (2)(ynow) + 14

t = 2d – xnow + 14

And now let’s apply it with the 33 year old and 22 year old:

t = 2(11) – 33 + 14

t = 22 – 33 + 14

t = 3

When the older person is 36, it will be okay to date the other person (who will be 25). To check the formula, we can return to the original formula. One year earlier should be no good:

y = x/2 + 7

y = 35/2 + 7

y = 17.5 + 7

y = 24.5

No good, because when the older person is 35 the younger person will be 24 (we assume they are born on the same day).

Now to check the solution’s age:

y = x/2 + 7

y = 36/2 + 7

y = 18 + 7

y = 25

Yes! When the older person is 36, the younger person will be 25.

The Lesson
The most referred to dating-age rule, y=x/2+7, is inadequate for real-world situations, and a new rule is needed. The new rule should determine whether it is acceptable to date someone and, if not, how long you must wait to date someone. The formula ynow + t = (1/2)(xnow+t) + 7 does this. If t is zero or negative, it is okay to date the person now. If t is positive, one must wait that long to date the younger person.

The commonly used formula has other problems, and this site does a great job of exploring additional important angles of the half your age plus seven rule with some data.