Author Archives: Jason

About Jason

Jason R. Koepke is Founder and Data Strategist at GNT LLC, a risk-analysis and data strategy firm that provides analytical and technical services to the public and private sectors. His work and research has been featured in the academic, financial, and technical industries.

Country Music’s Conservative Evolution

NPR has a short piece on country music and it’s dramatic turn toward conservatism in the second half of the 20th century. It is fairly interesting, so check it out of this type of talk is up your ally.

I find the piece most useful as a jumping point for other lines of thoughts. For example, how is country music conservative at all? Have you ever met someone not in the country music industry that was pro-Republican? Growing up in West Virginia and interacting with a fair bit of folk, bluegrass, alt-country, etc. musicians has left me with confident most of them are left-leaning, pot-smoking, root-for-the-underdog types–a description that does not fit well with the Republican party.

A similar confusion of a true music scene and a its industry cousin regularly happens with hip hop/rap. What, you don’t like rap because what you hear on the radio puts you off? Oh, okay.

To return to country music for a moment, I recall that when the Dixie Chicks latest album was released, a vocal minority targeted radio conglomerates to ensure that the new album was not played on the radio. This clear anti-freedom-of-expression signal by the music terrorists was expected to doom album sales. Although I do not know what overall sales were for the Dixie Chicks’ album, it was the number one selling album on iTunes for a long time. Oh, and they won a ton of awards, too.

Last, this subject reminds me of one of my most memorable Bill O’Reilly episodes. O’Reilly was in one of his frequent disputes, this time with Ludacris, and had some major hip hop magazine editor–I think it was the editor of Source–to discuss hip hop. Immediately, the interview took a predictable turn when O’Reilly started taking the piss out of hip hop because of its sexist and violent content. In an unusual response, the interviewee began spitting out Johnny Cash lyrics, all of which were incredibly violent and overtly sexist.

The point was not to dismiss problems with hip hop–how a music genre can be problematic baffles me–but to highlight the fact that plenty of music has these elements and it should not drown out the good material, or intent, of the remaining pieces. And there’s the whole double standard (vis-a-vis race) bit, too. Heh.

Tax-Payer Research That’s Off Limits

The blogosphere recently exploded in outrage over awareness that Congressional Research Service research is not publicly available.

For those who do not know, CRS is the research arm of Congress. They are probably best known for budget analysis, but they also do an incredibly wide variety of other top-notch research. You might remember some of their research, which concluded a war with Iraq would be expensive leading to an upset White House that dismissed the report as it did with most every other piece of questioning.

The research has always been difficult to attain, although for a while there was a new report posted everyday on their Web site. During this time, I would visit the Web site every day in order to download any relevant research. That daily feed, however, was killed off a couple years ago.

Now there is a movement to demand the research be available to the public.

I am in favor of this, of course, but wonder if the argument for freeing the research limited. Recently, I have been thinking about classified documents and the role of copyright (e.g., the US government can not copyright documents), tax-payer funded classified research, and open access. Would those calling for an open CRS also call for an open DNI?

Some people would and some wouldn’t, but how would the argument evolve into the two primary branches?